Q7. Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to full product?
Upon
starting the preliminary task, my group had very little experience with the
processes that are involved in creating a film. We started out not knowing all
that much about how a camera actually works, and wondered if we would be able
to even finish the task to the standards that were expected of us. We went into
filming our preliminary task with very little time spent on planning our shots,
as although we had created a storyboard, I felt we did not have enough
knowledge on which shot types were suitable for each shot, and we were quite
inexperienced.
An example of this is the scene were an over-the-shoulder shot
is used of the dead body and you can see the killer’s face is slightly hidden
by the body’s ear. We had aimed to use this shot to make it seem as though the
dead body was the one speaking, when in reality it was the killer who has a
form of mental illness. After watching our prelim back, however, I do not feel
that this scene worked very well, as it comes across as quite confusing to the
audience, and the over the shoulder shot is far too close to the subject’s
head, which disorientates viewers. We learnt from this though, and in our final
task we made sure our narrative was much easier to follow, and made sure our
camera shots were a little clearer and easier for viewers to understand. Having
created both the prelim task and the main task, I feel that my knowledge of the
different types of camera angles and shots has increased.
Another
point to make about our preliminary task was the continuity. We chose to shoot our
prelim in an empty classroom, and in all of our shots the room is visibly
empty. However, in one of the shots of the killer, there is a backpack on the
table that wasn’t there in all of the other shots, which marks not enough
attention paid to our continuity. For our final task, we made sure that our
continuity flowed, and we ended up with a film that does not contain any continuity
errors such as this one.
After
creating our preliminary task with a camera provided by the school, we soon
found that the quality was extremely fuzzy in the editing stages, and our end
result was quite blurry and hard to see. We originally planned to make sure we
would pick up a different camera from the school for our final film, as we did
not want to end up with a blurry main task. However this did not go according
to plan.
For our main
task, we planned to shoot our film over one weekend, spending both Saturday and
Sunday nights filming. However, after finishing school on Friday afternoon and
getting home to realise that in fact no one in our group had actually picked up
the camera from school, we had to rely on Van’s DSLR camera he had at home. We
went into filming on Saturday evening not knowing if Van’s camera would produce
a good quality image or not, and were worried that our final film would end up
having a bad quality image. In the end though, Van’s camera worked well, and so
forgetting to pick the camera up from school was actually not as catastrophic
as it first seemed, as we ended up with a film that was a great improvement in
terms of image and sound quality. Through this, however, I have learnt that
knowing exactly who will be in charge of the camera is a vital process in order
for things to run smoothly, and that we were actually very lucky our group
member had his own camera at home.
Eventually,
though, we ended up with an end product that we are all proud of, and feel that
we have learnt a great deal about the construction of film from the preliminary
to the main task.